lead: Silicon Valley investor Peter Te M book "there was a discussion from 0 to 1": "from 0 to 1 and from 1 to N, the former cause qualitative change, promote the process of social culture, concept and social change; the latter is caused by the quantitative change, confined to the shift in the zero and the game.
Silicon Valley investor Peter Te M book "there was a discussion from 0 to 1": "from 0 to 1 and from 1 to N, the former cause qualitative change, promote the process of social culture, concept and social change; the latter is caused by the quantitative change, confined to the shift in the zero and the game.
for entrepreneurs, you are more willing to choose the former or the latter? An unnamed investor told Entrepreneur: whether it is domestic or other countries in the world, most entrepreneurs are more willing to choose the former. But the choice of the latter is understandable, because most entrepreneurs do not want to do the latter on the surface of the spokesman, but it is doing things from 1 to N things.
an entrepreneur said: the current domestic product imitation is divided into two categories: first, the doctrine, but on the basis of local innovation again. For example, WeChat is one of the most typical successful cases, innovative mobile products which is a set of WhatsApp and Instagram in one; two is the direct product function both in echo what the books say, the business model, or product name of one copy of original products, there is no innovation at all.
these entrepreneurs said: with the maturity of the domestic investment environment and the government’s policy support for entrepreneurship to further increase, the first major category of innovative doctrine is being brought to the independent innovation. Direct echo what the books say entrepreneurs survival space is gradually narrowing. But in some hot areas there are still very serious cases of plagiarism. For example, the United States Industry O2O field.
this serious plagiarism phenomenon, on the surface, there is nothing. But behind it is the destruction of a good entrepreneurial atmosphere. The entrepreneur is more of a role in the withdrawal of a speculative venture, the original intention is wrong. Investors in the industry view: this team the most promising, this entrepreneurial plagiarism will not go too far. Because it is not standing in the user’s point of view to consider the issue, but for their immediate short-term self-interest.
" is a beautiful home to provide home beauty services of APP products, including services including: beauty, beauty, style, Manicure guidance. Since its on-line in October 2014, it has been faced with the plight of plagiarism. Not only in the product features, product LOGO was copied, even in the name of the product is also facing plagiarism. For example, the United States has a copy of Taoism, 1 beautiful home, beautiful home, etc..
reporter survey found that: 1 beautiful home not only in the PC end directly with the United States home, the same name, and even LOGO color, providing service type also follow the beauty home. In the industry view, the purpose of plagiarism is simple: first, through the United States home to the name of the user to create a